Breaking News Update Reconciliation Question-Answer Dataset
- Records
- 5000
- Size
- 0.3GB
- Format
- JSON
- Provider
MOBIUSI INC- Updated
- v1.02026-11-05
This dataset features questions that require comparing multiple excerpts from continuously updated breaking news reports, along with their answers. It distinguishes confirmed facts from unconfirmed or disputed claims and records corrections and updates, with evidence citations and reasoning summaries. It supports training and evaluating models that integrate evidence across texts, track changing information, and produce carefully qualified conclusions.
Overview
Dataset Insights
Preview
Sample Examples
Schema
Technical Specifications
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| file_name | string | File name |
| reports | array | The source reports and update excerpts provided as inputs for reconciliation. |
| question | string | The question to answer by comparing the supplied news report excerpts. |
| confirmed_facts | array | Facts explicitly established or consistently confirmed by the supplied reports. |
| reasoning_summary | string | A concise explanation of how the excerpts were compared and how the final supported conclusion was reached. |
| evidence_citations | array | Traceable excerpts that support, contradict, qualify, or correct the answer and claim assessments. |
| corrections_and_updates | array | Material changes in wording or factual status across successive reports. |
| current_supported_answer | string | A concise answer limited to conclusions supported by the supplied reports at the latest available update. |
| unconfirmed_or_disputed_claims | array | Claims whose status remains uncertain, conflicting, corrected, or otherwise not established by the latest reports. |
Trust
Compliance Statement
Authorization Type
Proprietary - Commercial AI Training License (No Redistribution)
Commercial Use
Requires exclusive subscription or authorization contract (monthly or per-invocation charging)
Privacy and Anonymization
No PII, no real company names, simulated scenarios follow industry standards
Compliance System
Compliant with China's Data Security Law / EU GDPR / supports enterprise data access logs
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
- What does the dataset include?
- Each example centers on a question that requires comparing multiple news excerpts. It includes a currently supported answer, confirmed facts, unconfirmed or disputed claims, correction and update records, evidence citations, and a reasoning summary.
- How does the dataset handle conflicting or unconfirmed reports?
- Examples distinguish confirmed facts from claims that remain uncertain, conflict with other reports, or have been corrected. Answers are limited to conclusions supported by the latest available reports, rather than presenting unverified claims as facts.
- Which training and evaluation tasks does it support?
- The data supports multi-hop question answering, cross-text evidence integration, claim status assessment, update tracking, and evidence citation generation. It can also be used for supervised fine-tuning and evaluation of news reasoning capabilities.
- How can I access the data, and what are the licensing terms?
- Refer to the product page for the available download method, data format, and licensing terms. Before use, verify that your intended use complies with the license and any requirements applicable to the source news content and related data.
Can't find the data you need?
Post a request and let data providers reach out to you.
Get this Dataset
High-quality data, ready for your next AI breakthrough.
Cite this Work
@dataset{Mobiusi2026,
title={Breaking News Update Reconciliation Question-Answer Dataset},
author={MOBIUSI INC},
year={2026},
url={https://www.mobiusi.com/datasets/552ccbce4c32b1504c8c3371306b54bd?dataset_scene_id=17},
urldate={2026-10-17},
keywords={breaking news QA dataset,news multi-hop reasoning,report update reconciliation,news fact verification,cross-text evidence integration,news QA training data,correction detection,reasoning SFT dataset},
version={1.0}
}Using this in research? Please cite us.